![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0056.jpg)
The Economist
September 22nd 2018
International 55
1
2
saster, has disputed those figures. In con-
trast, a sensible government reaction to
Florence probably helped limit damage
and loss of life. Mandatory evacuation or-
derswere issued three days before landfall.
NewOrleans only got such an order on the
eve ofKatrina’s arrival.
That Florence was not a chart-topping
storm is small comfort to the North Caro-
linianswhose homes and businesseswere
destroyed. Local economies could take
years to recover. Some homeowners will
be compensated by the national flood-in-
surance programme, which is subsidised
by the government, in effect paying people
to live in areas at high riskofflooding. Even
so, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency estimates that 40% of small busi-
nesses never reopen after a natural disas-
ter. The state’s livestock industry has al-
ready taken a beating. The state agriculture
department said that Florence had killed
3.4m chickens and drowned 5,500 pigs.
Such casualties are expected to rise.
There’s no sun up in the sky
If storms can wreak such havoc in the
world’s richest country, their impact in
poor Asia-Pacific countries is even more
far-reaching. Every year, the Asia-Pacific re-
gion is battered bymore and bigger storms
than reach America. There, the approach
has been to move people away from the
coast where possible. After Bangladesh
found itself in 1970 in the path of cyclone
Bhola, which killed between 300,000 and
500,000 people, making it the deadliest
tropical cyclone on record, it began build-
ing a large network of raised shelters. Still,
some people would refuse to use them. So
now they accommodate livestock as well
as people; have separate facilities forwom-
en; and are accessible to the disabled. But,
according to Saleemul Huq, who directs
the International Centre for Climate
Change andDevelopment, a research insti-
tute in Dhaka, the Bangladeshi system’s
biggest success has been its education pro-
gramme, whichhas taught childrenhowto
respond to earlywarnings and take shelter.
The Philippines, too, has grim experi-
ence of storms. Haiyan, one of the stron-
gest tropical cyclones yet recorded, which
struck in 2013, remains a fresh memory. It
pummelled the central part of the Philip-
pines and crossed the country, killing 6,300
people and leaving1,062missing, by the of-
ficial count. In comparison, the govern-
ment’s handling of Typhoon Mangkhut is
counted a success. After it passed, Harry
Roque, a spokesman for President Rodrigo
Duterte, said his bosswas “very, very satis-
fied” with the effort.
Yet by September 19th the death toll
stoodat 81people and 70were stillmissing.
The number will probably rise. Rescue
workers are still findingvictims of themost
deadly landslide, which buried a commu-
nity of illegal miners digging for gold in a
worked-out mine in the Cordillera moun-
tains, in the north of Luzon, the main is-
land. On September 15th, the day when
Mangkhut hit Luzon, the National Disaster
Risk Reduction and Management Council
(
NDRRMC
) reported 194,368 people had
taken refuge in shelters (mainly schools). It
estimated the cost of the damage to agri-
culture at 14.3bn pesos ($264m). Later the
NDRRMC
estimated that about 1.1mpeople
had been affected by the storm.
Haiyan affected far more people, but in
some respects Mangkhut, though it passed
through only the north of Luzon, was big-
ger. Its bands of rain-bearing cloud swirled
around an area 900km in diameter. As it
approached Luzon, its winds sustained
speeds of up to 205kph (127mph) near the
centre, with gusts of up to 255kph.
One lesson learnt from earlier disasters
was the need for earlier andmore emphat-
ic advice to people to seek refuge. The gov-
ernment’s weather-forecasting service,
called
PAGASA
, was tracking Mangkhut
well before it reached Luzon. It warned of
strong winds and heavy rain that would
cause highwaves at sea, stormsurges up to
six metres in height along the coast, and
flooding and landslides inland.
PAGASA
has been tracking roughly 20
storms a year since its founding in1972, and
this time its forecasts were accurate. They
were translated into warnings spread on
radio and television, by text message and
over the internet. Radio is the most widely
used mass medium, and only the poorest
Filipinos arewithout mobile phones.
Mangkhut’s winds blew down flimsy
buildings, tore the roofs off sturdier ones
and felled trees. But, like Florence, it
wreaked most of its destruction through
rain, which caused landslides and flash
floods, inundating fields and ruining the
crops in them, making roads impassable
and cutting off electricity supplies. The
storm halted all normal economic life.
Schools were closed, to keep the pupils
safe and to be used as public shelters; busi-
nesses were shuttered; ferry sailings and
international and domestic flights were
cancelled. Mobile-phone networks were
generally resilient, however.
The Philippines has a hierarchy of di-
saster-risk reduction, and management
councils at every level of government. The
system worked quite well this time. But it
suffers from a malaise that afflicts the en-
tire political structure. Politicians at the
centre can saywhat they like, but local pol-
iticians do what they like. It also faces a
more universal problem: that some disas-
ter victims think they know best or, as in
Bangladesh, are reluctant to abandon their
property, such as livestock, to take shelter.
The freelance miners in the Cordillera had
that attitude. Most of those who died dur-
ing Typhoon Haiyan were killed by storm
surges in the eastern city of Tacloban, hav-
ing been directed to take refuge in coastal
shelters. Local lore had it that if a typhoon
was coming, safetywas in the high ground.
Haiyan also shows the importance of
official competence. The interior minister
at the time, Mar Roxas (later one of the
presidential candidates defeated by Mr
Duterte), directed the response from Taclo-
ban, but omitted to take a satellite phone.
When the storm made mobile-phone net-
works inoperable and prevented him leav-
ing Tacloban, he was unable to respond to
looting. Before Mangkhut struck, Mr Du-
terte called for the wider use of satellite
phones by the authorities.
Mangkhut was not through when it left
the Philippines. It terrorised Hong Kong
(see box on next page) and Macau, where
high winds and flooding left some 20,000
households without power—and, unprec-
edentedly, all 42 casinos shut for 33 hours.
The city appeared better prepared than it
was before Hato, last year’s largest ty-
phoon, inwhich ten people died. This time
no liveswere lost.
The same dayMangkhut made landfall
in Guangdong, China’s most populous
province, flooding coastal and riverside
neighbourhoods, and toppling thousands
of trees. China’s state weather bureau said
A T L A N T I C
O C E A N
UNITED
STATES
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
P A C I F I C
O C E A N
PHILIPPINES
Hong Kong
Guangzhou
CHINA
LUZON
Wind speeds*
Tropical storm
(63-118 km/h)
Hurricane/typhoon
(>118 km/h)
Trails of destruction
Hurricane
Florence
Sources: NOAA; Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System
*Sustained surface wind speeds
Typhoon
Mangkhut