Previous Page  73 / 79 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 79 Next Page
Page Background

70

Дугаар (550) 31, 2021

Монголын хүн амын сэтгүүл

● Fifth stage

: Making independent

purchases without parental supervision

Each member of the family has different

roles in purchasing, depending on the type of

product. Scholar Sheth (1971) identifies five

different roles of family members in household

purchasing, which is still the basis of studying

family purchasing decisions theory. These five

roles are:

1) The information gatherer (Gatekeeper) who

obtains and evaluates information from diverse

sources; 2) Influencer who establishes the

decision criteria by which products are compared

(price, quality, or design etc.); 3) The decision-

maker, who decides which brand or product

to purchase; 4) The buyer or implementer of

purchasing; 5) The consumer, who uses the

product or service and evaluates it, giving some

feedback for repurchase or not, regarding the

satisfaction with chosen goods. 

A child can play any of these roles in the family-it

depends on the type of product, service, and the

relationships between family members as well as

family attitudes and authority structure.  However,

researchers Shoham and Dalakas (2005) state

that children tend to have more influence in

the first two stages (problem recognition and

information search) of the family buying decision

process. Although Kaur and Singh (2006) noted

that family buying decisions are generally

decided by the husband and wife jointly, they are

significantly influenced by children who request a

specific product. 

Previous research on the effects of socio-

economic variables such as household income

on children’s influence has been mixed.

Depending on household income, children’s

role and influence differ in the family purchase

decision-making process. For instance, Beatty

and Talpade (1994) found that children’s

influence increases in dual-income and high-

income families. A child tends to have more

influence on the family’s purchase decision if the

family’s income level is high. 

Ferreira Pedro et al. (2008) also showed that

children whose parents have a high income are

most likely to have a strong influence on family

decision-making than low-income families.

Tinson et al. (2005) found that children’s influence

on family purchasing decisions differs depending

on the product type and found that children were

more likely to be involved in purchasing products

for themselves than shared products used by all

family members. 

Based on the above theoretical background, we

hypothesize as follows:

H1: Children from high-income families

have more influence on their family decision

making.

Parents who have a higher education may

engage in family shopping to socialize

their children and prepare them for future

purchases. Therefore, children of parents

from lowor higheducationbackgrounds have

an equivalent influence and responsibility

in the family decision-making process. To

date, plenty of research has been done in

this field. For instance, a study from Slama

and Taschian (1985) showed that parents’

education is more positively related to the

purchase involvement of children. 

Therefore, we would expect:

H2: Children from high educated families

have more influence on their family decision

making

.

The changes in the family structure have

been found to increase children’s decision-

making status (Flurry, 2007). Foxman et al.

(1989) reveal that children’s influence on

family purchasing decisions depends on

family structure. Moreover, Taylor, Moore

and Glynn (1984; 1985) found that children

in a single-parent household had the most

significant influence, as their parents were

often younger and had higher income

levels or higher educational levels. Taylor,

Moore, and Glynn (1985) found children

from single-parent families are much more

likely to buy food products on their own and

influence brand choices more than children

from the other family structures. An increase

in working women and delayed childbearing

has resulted inmothers tending to havemore

money to spend on their children (McNeal

1992). Therefore, they involve their children

more in their purchases and give them the

power to make choices and decisions.

In view of this and the above it is expected

that: