Previous Page  18 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

18

The Economist

May 5th 2018

Letters are welcome and should be

addressed to the Editor at

The Economist, The Adelphi Building,

1-11John Adam Street,

London

WC2N 6HT

E-mail:

letters@economist.com

More letters are available at:

Economist.com/letters

Reporting on Trump

Lexington’s column on the

FBI

raiding the office of President

Trump’s lawyer did not men-

tion some salient facts (April

14th), notably the issues associ-

atedwith attorney-client

privilege. If lawyers can have

their offices ransacked and

then be subject to prosecutions

forwhat is discovered, what

effect will this have on repre-

sentation for difficult cases?

Nor did the columnmention

the asymmetry of how

attorney-client privilegewas

used in the

FBI

’s timid in-

vestigation ofHillaryClinton’s

e-mail server, specifically in

the case of the testimony of

her chief of staff. Finally, there

was no discussion of howfar

afield Robert Mueller, the

special counsel, has taken the

focus of his investigation

comparedwith the original

remit ofRussian influence.

If you don’t like this presi-

dent, fine. Lots of us don’t and

there is plenty of legitimate

ammunition to discuss. Now,

however, you are feeding the

narrative that themainstream

media is just hopelessly

biased. This leads to a general

discounting of your reporting.

People just stopwatching or

readingwhat youwrite. There

is also somethingworse. What

goes around eventually comes

around. What will you say

when the attorney’s office of a

politician ofwhomyou

approve gets ransacked by his

political opponents?

STEPHEN ARBOGAST

Professor of the practice of

finance

University of North Carolina at

Chapel Hill

Your lament forwhat the

Republican Party has become

was, if anything, toomild

(“How the elephant got its

Trump”, April 21st). It has be-

come the party of lies and

xenophobia, of irresponsibil-

ity andmoral corruption,

fetishising blind loyalty to a

very badman. Beseeching

responsible Republicans to

resist thismisses themark,

when you indicate that the

party is irredeemable. What

they should do is quit, as I did

after 53 years of active commit-

ment. I cannot associatemy-

selfwith today’s Republican-

ism. I amheartbroken.

FRANK ROBINSON

Albany, New York

Poland’s government

Your leader on the Polish

government read in places like

an election pamphlet from the

opposition Civic Platform

party (“APolish pickle”, April

21st). The governing Lawand

Justice (

P

i

S

) party received an

overwhelmingmandate from

the Polish people in 2015,

including a clear instruction to

rebalance a judiciary, which

had been stackedwith allies

by the former government

without any complaint from

the EuropeanUnion.

To counter itsweakness at

home, Civic Platform is seek-

ing to Europeanisewhat are

essentially domestic issues

and fight its battles in Brussels

rather thanWarsaw. By impos-

ing an agenda of ever increas-

ing centralisation and trying to

force amythical European

identity onmember states (the

same policies that contributed

to Brexit), the

EU

is behaving,

in the eyes ofmany in Poland,

like the former Soviet Union.

ASHLEY FOX, MEP

Leader of the Conservatives in

the European Parliament

Brussels

Poland’sMazowsze region is as

“gorgeous as a Chopin

concerto” (“Change of state”,

April 21st)? Themaestro’s two

piano concertos have been

calledmany things including,

rather unkindly, bad pieces for

orchestra. But nowwe are

invited to thinkof themas “an

undulating quilt of cereal

fields”. Corn?

MICHAEL KNIGHT

Geneva

Singapore’s politics

The People’s Action Party has

retained power in Singapore

not because the electoral

system is “manicured” (“Not

much leeway”, April 28th), but

because it knows and expects

that if it does not measure up it

will be voted out. We have had

14 general elections since 1959,

all free and fair and robustly

contested bymany parties.

The PublicOrder and Safe-

ty (Special Powers) Act and the

Select Committee onDeliber-

ate Online Falsehoods have

nothing to dowith keeping

“unruly critics” in checkor the

government in power. The act

applies to serious incidents

affecting public order, includ-

ing terrorist attacks. The Lon-

don riots in 2011 started out as a

peaceful demonstration that

degenerated into violence,

fuelled by social media. We

drew lessons from this and

other incidents in formulating

our act. The committee hear-

ings looked into serious issues

similar to thosewhich

The

Economist

has decried.

As for political succession,

the next generation of leaders

is following the same process

as previous generations. They

areworking as a teamand

taking themeasure of one

another. Theywill agree, in

good time, who among them-

selveswill be

primus inter

pares

. Ultimately voters have

the final say, becausewhoever

becomes primeministermust

convince the electorate to give

himand his party themandate

to govern, as in theWestmin-

stermodel. Our variant may

not be rambunctious enough

for

The Economist

, but it has

workedwell for Singapore.

FOO CHI HSIA

High commissioner for

Singapore

London

The grateful dead

“Funerals of the future” (April

14th) looked at the increasingly

expensive business of dis-

posing of the dead. Oneway to

reduce costs is to rehearse a

funeral. Death often comes

unexpectedly and inconve-

niently, causing friends and

family to have to plan sudden-

ly for the funeral. A funeral

rehearsal, flexibly scheduled,

so that all can attend, including

the soon-to-be-departed as a

participant in the flesh, is more

satisfying. He or she could lie

in comfort and listen to the

encomiums. If they are not

sufficiently positive, one could

rise up and glare.

THOMAS CALHOUN

Bethesda, Maryland

Mywife, Mary, died in Febru-

ary. Her bodywill train stu-

dent doctors in anatomy

through a not-for-profit consor-

tiumof local medical schools,

the HumanityGifts Registry.

The removal ofmywife’s body

was done caringly. There is a

memorial service for families

and students and the ashes are

returned.

LEONARD FINEGOLD

Media, Pennsylvania

When I was a criminal

investigator I participated in 20

exhumations of coffins buried

in concrete vaults. Fancy and

expensive caskets. Without

exception, after only a few

years each casket had failed in

someway, most often because

of the so-called hermetic seal.

The end result were contents

which in noway resembled a

sleeping loved one. From

soupy flotsam to giant mould

blooms, the interiorswere

hideous. Bottom line is, do not

waste yourmoney.

MIKE POST

Los Angeles

I am reminded of “The Big

Lebowski”. Reacting to the

expense of a funeral urn,

Walter Sobchak (played by

JohnGoodman) shouts at the

undertaker that “just because

we’re bereaved doesn’t make

us saps!” But as the urn is the

funeral parlour’s “most mod-

estly priced receptacle”, he

instead places his friend’s

ashes in an empty coffee tin.

AUGUSTUS HANEY

New York

7

Letters

РЕЛИЗ ПОДГОТОВИЛА ГРУППА "What's News"

VK.COM/WSNWS