Previous Page  76 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

The Economist

September 22nd 2018

75

For daily analysis and debate on books, arts and

culture, visit

Economist.com/culture

1

T

HIS summer Ganesh Gaitonde’s eyes

burned through the monsoon haze

from billboards across the metropolis. The

fictional gangster, played with seductive

menace byNawazuddin Siddiqui, is one of

the heroes of “Sacred Games”, Netflix’s

flagship Indian drama series. The show is

based on an epic novel by Vikram Chan-

dra, a 900-page testament to the romance

ofMumbai—the biggest, baddest city in In-

dia, 18m people and counting, bursting at

the seamswith schemes, sex andmurder.

Published in 2006, Mr Chandra’s book

formed a de facto trilogy with two other

works that captured Mumbai’s idea of it-

self at the turn of the new millennium:

“Maximum City”, Suketu Mehta’s non-fic-

tion portrait of Bombay (as it was named

until 1995, and is still called by some), and

“Q&A” byVikas Swarup, whichwas adapt-

ed for the cinema as “Slumdog Million-

aire”. In the years since, Mumbai has

emerged as a gritty, glamorous epitome of

modern urban life, a capital of noir for the

wholeworld to admire, or revile.

Yet film, fiction and filth have been

chasing one another up and down the

city’s streets for decades. Its storytellers

have often been enmeshed in the dramas

they describe; their tales of Mumbai have

reflected its lurching growth, the scenes

and themes evolving with its criminal

for the authorities. It can be impossible to

tell which tales were invented and which

reported. In one of the best known, a char-

acter who is also called Manto becomes

entranced by a Bombay gangster with a

heart of gold. The gangster’s rationale for

carrying a dagger instead of a gun might

serve as a credo forManto’s prose style:

With this there’s no bang at all. You can

thrust it into someone’s stomach just like

this. It’s so smooth that the bastard won’t

even knowwhat’s going on.

The Manto of that story loved the hood-

lum, and the real-life Manto loved Bom-

bay. But these loves were complicated;

muck and beauty were inextricably en-

twined, as they are forMumbai’s artists to-

day. As the character asks, “Who in Bom-

bay cares about anyone? No one gives a

damn if you live or die.” After his depar-

ture for Lahore—and before his own early

death—Manto continued to set his stories

in Bombay, thus creating a nostalgic prece-

dent for Salman Rushdie’s “Midnight’s

Children” and Rohinton Mistry’s “A Fine

Balance”, both written after their authors

had left the city of their youth.

Film-makers mapped the underworld.

In1955 “Shree 420” told of a small-time con

artist who comes to Bombay and learns its

soul-destroying lessons too late. Likemany

subsequent movies, “Deewaar”, released

in 1975, was based on a celebrity gangster,

the city’s first—an immigrant from the

south who, at a time when India’s eco-

nomic links to the world were flimsy, be-

came a smuggler and ultimately ruled

whole districts of themetropolis.

Mumbai noir was to become even

darker and more frenetic, mirroring events

on the streets. In 1991 the country’s eco-

demi-monde and quicksilver economy.

India’s business capital, and home to its

most polyglot population, Mumbai has al-

ways been a good place tomake an anony-

mous deal. For most of the 20th century,

the colonial port-city on the Arabian Sea

was both the centre of organised crime on

the subcontinent and the heart of Hindi

cinema. Bollywood made movies that

lionised the localmafia,mobsters financed

productions and the nightlife bound the

two together.

No bang at all

At the dawn of independence, the figures

of writer and low-life

flâneur

came togeth-

er in Saadat Hasan Manto—whomMr Sid-

diqui plays in a biopic released in India on

September 21st. Written and directed by

Nandita Das, “Manto” weaves together its

subject’s life and his stories, taking in his

struggles with censorship and alcoholism

and the partition of India and Pakistan.

Like Ms Das and Mr Siddiqui them-

selves, Manto migrated to the cosmopoli-

tan city from the inland provinces, work-

ing intermittently as a screenwriter.

Inspired by Victor Hugo and Anton Che-

khov, he wrote from life. He believed in

keeping the worst company, knowing it to

be the best for his art; prostitutes were of-

ten his heroines, a perennial sticking point

Mumbai noir

Maxed-out city

MUMBAI

In India’s commercial capital, art and crime have always been entwined

Books and arts

Also in this section

76 A philosophical murder-mystery

77 Cold-war espionage

77 America’s role in the world

78 Johnson: Lodestars and fingerprints